you are right. i will change my question. again your opinion,or wishful thinking. is like the people saying that we have the right not to be poor. does not exist
can you cite where this right is documented? if you can, thanks
Rights pre-exist the formation of a society. They represent what you can do if no individual or no state stops you. You can say what you want. You can carry arms to defend yourself. You can practice your religion. You can keep your stuff. You can assault your neighbor and take his stuff to make it yours so you can keep it. (Society is actually created for the purpose of stopping you from doing that last one as a way of protecting your neighbor's right to do the next to the last one.)
You cannot NOT be poor. You can strive not to be poor, you may even succeed, you may even keep up the unpoorness for a long time, but you have no expectation that you will NOT be poor. Therefore, NOT being poor is not a right. The only way that the state can ensure a privilege NOT to be poor is to take from others to give to those destined, because of stupidity or bad luck, to be poor. That is violating the right to keep one's stuff that I mentioned above.
Rights are those things you can do in the absence of the state that would not stop others from doing the things that they can do. Essential rights are properly carried into the formation of the state and are to be protected by a moral state. Those essential rights (Speech, Press, Self-Defense, Association, Due Process, Life, Liberty, Property, etc) are the ones we use to protect the non-essential rights from state intrusion.
Public accommodation laws violate the essential right of association. You have that right to associate. The state may have abridged it. But you have it. You have the RKBA. The state may have infringed on it, but you still have the Right. Rights don't stop being rights when the state immorally chooses to legislate away their practice.
On edit: Rights don't have to be documented. They are a philosophical concept. Either you believe in individual rights to which the state should be subordinated or you believe in tyranny as a proper function of the state.