imported post
I don't know if this has been addressed earlier, but it appears that Ada County Commissioners need some education on pre-emption. Oddly, note the date of its revision - Jan. 30, 2006 - well after the pre-emption statute was passed.
5-4-2: POSSESSION OF FIREARMS:
A. Short Title: This section shall be known and cited as the ADA COUNTY FIREARMS ORDINANCE.
B. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to prohibit the possession of a firearm in any public building, owned or operated by Ada County, and making such possession a misdemeanor violation, except in those circumstances where the individual carrying or possessing the firearm is a law enforcement official of the state of Idaho or a political subdivision thereof, a district court marshal, or an individual possessing a valid permit to carry a concealed weapon.
C. Definitions: All words and phrases used in this sectionshall be given their ordinary, commonly understood and accepted meanings.
D. Applicability Of Prohibition: This section does not apply to law enforcement officials of the state of Idaho, or a political subdivision thereof, to marshals of the fourth judicial district, or to an individual who possesses a valid permit to carry a concealed weapon, issued by the Ada County sheriff. In addition, the prohibition set forth in this section shall not apply to individuals in attendance at any organized firearm trading or sale exhibition conducted at the Expo Idaho facilities.
E. Firearm Possession Prohibited, Penalty: It shall be unlawful for any person to have in his possession a firearm, whether loaded or unloaded, while said person is within any public building, owned or operated by Ada County. Any person convicted of a violation of this prohibition shall be punished as provided by Idaho Code, section 18-113 as it may from time to time be amended and/or retitled. (Ord. 96, 9-17-1980; amd. Ord. 603, 1-30-2006)
Since this is a hot election year with two of the seats being contested, I think it would be appropriate to ask the candidates what their understanding of the law is, and whether they would support amending or repealing this section to comply with state law. What say you?
Here's the link; hope it works, since I don't know how to insert html:
http://sterling.webiness.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=447
I don't know if this has been addressed earlier, but it appears that Ada County Commissioners need some education on pre-emption. Oddly, note the date of its revision - Jan. 30, 2006 - well after the pre-emption statute was passed.
5-4-2: POSSESSION OF FIREARMS:
A. Short Title: This section shall be known and cited as the ADA COUNTY FIREARMS ORDINANCE.
B. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to prohibit the possession of a firearm in any public building, owned or operated by Ada County, and making such possession a misdemeanor violation, except in those circumstances where the individual carrying or possessing the firearm is a law enforcement official of the state of Idaho or a political subdivision thereof, a district court marshal, or an individual possessing a valid permit to carry a concealed weapon.
C. Definitions: All words and phrases used in this sectionshall be given their ordinary, commonly understood and accepted meanings.
D. Applicability Of Prohibition: This section does not apply to law enforcement officials of the state of Idaho, or a political subdivision thereof, to marshals of the fourth judicial district, or to an individual who possesses a valid permit to carry a concealed weapon, issued by the Ada County sheriff. In addition, the prohibition set forth in this section shall not apply to individuals in attendance at any organized firearm trading or sale exhibition conducted at the Expo Idaho facilities.
E. Firearm Possession Prohibited, Penalty: It shall be unlawful for any person to have in his possession a firearm, whether loaded or unloaded, while said person is within any public building, owned or operated by Ada County. Any person convicted of a violation of this prohibition shall be punished as provided by Idaho Code, section 18-113 as it may from time to time be amended and/or retitled. (Ord. 96, 9-17-1980; amd. Ord. 603, 1-30-2006)
Since this is a hot election year with two of the seats being contested, I think it would be appropriate to ask the candidates what their understanding of the law is, and whether they would support amending or repealing this section to comply with state law. What say you?
Here's the link; hope it works, since I don't know how to insert html:
http://sterling.webiness.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=447