eye95
Well-known member
The stop of a person himself is a “seizure”. A Terry stop, and the allowed searches during one, are 4A issues.
Wrong again. A seizure is if the person is not free to walk away.The stop of a person himself is a “seizure”. A Terry stop, and the allowed searches during one, are 4A issues.
The stop of a person himself is a “seizure”. A Terry stop, and the allowed searches during one, are 4A issues.
Another irrational post.Wrong again. A tick is a form of an arachnid.
Oh, wait, that is a non-sequitur, designed only to distract, much like yours. Never mind.
I'm glad you admit that you can't write a coherent sentence.No, actually, I don’t want to argue this point further. Another wrote a rational post that helped me make the precise point I was trying to make. So, have at it. Continue to argue the point if you wish.
Thanks...as to your last statement, that would be a unlawful seizure cuz every cop knows how to get to a doughnut shop, like birds flying south for the winter, it's in there DNA...or, it's a fella posing as a cop.OC for ME, A very good post. You make very clear that you are presenting your opinion. Then you go on and explain why your belief is what it is with case law citings.
Now, where the problem will be is someone will argue with you and it will become obvious they didn't read the cases you cited. But, they will insist your wrong.
I will add one caveat, if a cop stops you to ask directions to the nearest doughnut shop, that is not a seizure.