• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

US Supreme Court Date Scheduled For NY Gun Control..

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,131
Location
White Oak Plantation
Will this case, if New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. wins, actually lead to the restoration of our 2A? Nope! NYCs Sullivan Act remains...small steps? No steps I say! Will I enjoy the benefits of a New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. win?...Nope again! The voters of NY have spoken and SCOTUS will not address a 2A violation that the voters of NY have approved.

SCOTUS will not enforce their Heller & McDonald rulings.
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
4,900
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Will this case, if New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. wins, actually lead to the restoration of our 2A? Nope! NYCs Sullivan Act remains...small steps? No steps I say! Will I enjoy the benefits of a New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. win?...Nope again! The voters of NY have spoken and SCOTUS will not address a 2A violation that the voters of NY have approved.

SCOTUS will not enforce their Heller & McDonald rulings.
I think that if Clarence Thomas writes the opinion or a concurring opinion he will address Heller and McDonald.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,131
Location
White Oak Plantation
I think that if Clarence Thomas writes the opinion or a concurring opinion he will address Heller and McDonald.
Perhaps, yet Scalia's powerful words in Heller did not change state level, nor federal level, prior restraint statutory infringements.

Terry is a clear violation of the 2A and 4A and the court has had an untold number of opportunities to correct a prior wrong...nadda...excuse? "Each case must be ruled on based on the unique set of circumstances"...BS!! Too many are far too similar in all but names and places.

Heine...what is there to say?

Kelo?

QI? Please don't get me started.

Relying on judges to "police" judges is a fools errand...cops will not police themselves and prosecutors are leery of the next election cycle.

Cops have proven time and again to fear their union bosses and not the US Constitution...thanks to judges, and to a lesser extent legislatures.

Clarence Thomas has not been listened to yet...what makes you think a very narrow decision in a anti-gun city/state is going to change anything outside of NYC, let alone NY...remember, the case for the suit being moot is not unfounded and will not be ignored...NYC/NY "fixed" it...see...

ETA: comma
 
Last edited:
Top