...Those who sent obnoxious and derisive PMs can stick it in their ear!
Is it too late for me to send you an obnoxious and derisive PM?
I have to agree that, while having a central organization to support a cause sounds like a good idea, it is NEVER perfect.
The NRA does good work, but they can only move forward with one position on any given issue.
I'm against requiring training for a CHL. My wife is okay with the training requirement. It doesn't matter where any organization stands on that issue, one of us won't be in agreement with that position.
Keeping it decentralized, with small groups meeting throughout the states, and having Internet forums such as OCDO for information gathering and dispersal, works well for people of all opinions. For taboo topics on one site, there are other sites that allow such talk.
Some people believe in the open carry of firearms OTHER THAN handguns. Perfect example. OCDO, this very site, simply does not allow such discussion. At all. Period.
In Ohio, at least two actual organizations, Ohioans for Concealed Carry and Buckeye Firearms Association, exist to do the tangible work at the statehouse. These groups do not actively promote open carry, but are not shy about asking OC'ers to attend their functions to 'help make a point'. Why do we OC'ers tolerate this 'red-headed stepchild' treatment? Because those organizations have never worked against open carry.
"Can't we all just get along?" Yes. Yes, we can. Just don't try to shoehorn all of us into one box and expect it to happen.