Please stop the emotional rant, there is nothing in the preemption law about discharging firearms. While on the reservations you do have to follow tribal law, you obviously have no idea of what you speak. Noise ordinances have nothing to do whatsoever with firearm preemption, that is just outright stupid to think that it does. Not to mention that FMP can charge a person with illegal dumping of a hazardous material. The list is endless of what a person can be charged with. The preemption law has nothing to do with endangerment, dumping, and noise laws. Even the state clearly shows they do not a allow reckless discharge of a firearm. You have much more than reading comprehension issues.
AGAIN where in the preemption statute does it define discharge of a firearm?
"the whole field of regulation of firearms and ammunition, including the purchase, sale, transfer, taxation, manufacture, ownership, possession, storage, and transportation"
The field of regulation is clearly spelled out.
I'm sorry to say this WW but it would appear that notalawer is correct in this matter. (not addressing the reservation side of the discussion, but rather just the discharge of a firearm in city limits). I can't find any laws against it.
The only thing remotely close is the 790.15 Discharging firearm in public or on residential property.—
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) or subsection (3), any person who knowingly discharges a firearm in any public place or on the right-of-way of any paved public road, highway, or street, who knowingly discharges any firearm over the right-of-way of any paved public road, highway, or street or over any occupied premises, or
who recklessly or negligently discharges a firearm outdoors on any property used primarily as the site of a dwelling as defined in s. 776.013 or zoned exclusively for residential use commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. This section does not apply to a person lawfully defending life or property or performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm or to a person discharging a firearm on public roads or properties expressly approved for hunting by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission or Florida Forest Service.
(2) Any occupant of any vehicle who knowingly and willfully discharges any firearm from the vehicle within 1,000 feet of any person commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3) Any driver or owner of any vehicle, whether or not the owner of the vehicle is occupying the vehicle, who knowingly directs any other person to discharge any firearm from the vehicle commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
The only cites I have are two news articles that would highly suggest that the discharge of a firearm on your property is preempted by the state, and is only punishable if done in a reckless or negligent manner.
http://cmfmedia.org/2011/10/new-gun-law/
"The following are some of the ordinances in Seminole County that have been repealed as a result of the new gun law.
Oviedo – prohibit the discharge of firearm in city limits.
Winter Springs – prohibit firing a gun on city street of public grounds
Sanford – prohibiting firing a gun in city park.
Seminole County – prohibiting firearms in county parks, landfills or discharge of firearm within 500ft of residence"
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...0120630_1_gun-ordinances-gun-rights-local-gun
"The changes have forced some law-enforcement agencies to treat gunfire complaints differently, short of actual injuries or property damage. Earlier this year, Eustis police could do nothing when residents complained about hunters shooting ducks near their lakefront homes. When confronted by police, the shooters showed copies of the law."
The law that both articles are refering to as far as I can tell is the FL preemption law.