Comparison fail. The two situations are extremely different.
The two situations in the image. They're different for a number of reasons. In Colorado, the man threw tear gar canisters then immediately opened fire on the crowd. In Florida, two men, one with a bat and another with a rusted, broken gun attempted an armed robbery of an internet cafe.Which "two" situations? Several were mentioned.
And while you are at it, would yu please help me understand why you think there is a difference? Just saying so does not help me understand what you are trying to get at.
stay safe.
This is irrelevant, the argument isn't whether or not the man in Florida should have acted(he should have and did), the argument is whether the two situations are identical. They're not.One never knows whether a robber is just a thief or a cold-blooded murderer.
Which "two" situations? Several were mentioned.
And while you are at it, would yu please help me understand why you think there is a difference? Just saying so does not help me understand what you are trying to get at.
stay safe.
I would say the "two" in the picture is a comparison fail.
Armed robbers don't shoot people? They certainly do. The goals of the two groups may be different but the premise of the comparison is not the crime being committed but the fact that in 1 scenario the lawful group was armed and in the second, not.
Otherwise, one would have to look to Waco as a second one as a comparison but in this instance it was the government who were the "terrorists" and the Davidians were able to stop their assault and hold out for a considerable period of time.
Did I say armed robbers don't shoot people? Why no, no I didn't. .