DocWalker
Regular Member
If I were a cop, I would be duty-bound to arrest a trespasser.
At the moment, it is lawful to trespass a carrier (as it should be).
At the moment, it is unlawful to trespass a black man for being black (as it should NOT be, morally).
So, in the first case, I would arrest. In the second, I would not--but only because it would be unlawful to do so, errantly IMO.
So you want your cake and to eat it also...nice
I don't disagree with anything you say let me get that out there.
What I'm saying is (and I think we agree), that the goverment needs to butt out of peoples lives. Property owners should be allowed to make their own rules on who they serve and who they don't. We also agree that if a buisness discrimniates due to race, age, color, carry or any other reason then it should be ok just not right. A buisness or private property can be boycotted and maybe go out of buisness due to their narrow vision.
The problem is this isn't reallity; the goverment tells private property owners and buisnesses they can't NOT serve someone due to certain things...and until everyone is equal then we will have this problem.
My solution would be to have any private buisness or land owner that invites people into their property but restricts the freedom of carry is responsiable for the safety of everyone allowed on their property. If someone gets attacked or hurt they are responsiable and can not only be sued for everything they have but can criminaly be charged with neglect as they should have known that a "no firearms" sign doesn't work. We also have data to back it up the stats on that.