Turbod'1
Regular Member
Just wondering... is there any precedent that the 2A was used to defend having 'prohibited offense weapons' such as knives, billy clubs, baseball bats, etc?
I'm curious as, I can't quite get my mind around the fact that I can OC a Glock --while, simultaneously, my carry of a Gerber "springloaded" knife is a no-no.
From my Rent-a-cop days, I carried a Glock 17, Asp Baton, Fox Labs OC spray [stated on the can "For Law Enforcement Only"], generic 'snapblade' and a kubaton to boot; If you look at that list (other than the Glock), as a 'normal civilian' with no certifications/permits -- all are "prohibited offense weapons".
So, the guy that has a bat in his car and has to use or present it, against a road rager will likely be questioned as to whether he was en route to a ball game? Then charged with a crime?
I'm curious as, I can't quite get my mind around the fact that I can OC a Glock --while, simultaneously, my carry of a Gerber "springloaded" knife is a no-no.
From my Rent-a-cop days, I carried a Glock 17, Asp Baton, Fox Labs OC spray [stated on the can "For Law Enforcement Only"], generic 'snapblade' and a kubaton to boot; If you look at that list (other than the Glock), as a 'normal civilian' with no certifications/permits -- all are "prohibited offense weapons".
So, the guy that has a bat in his car and has to use or present it, against a road rager will likely be questioned as to whether he was en route to a ball game? Then charged with a crime?