countryclubjoe
Regular Member
Driving is a privileged, not a right.
Walk, ride a bike, ride public transportation and your identity is safe.
And some prefer " slavery' over "liberty"..
Your choice is well noted..
Driving is a privileged, not a right.
Walk, ride a bike, ride public transportation and your identity is safe.
Oh, oh, OH! I know!! That's the one where if a hooker asks a prospective john if he's a cop and what his badge number is, he has to tell her, right?
So, um... I got's to ask. What 'personal info' is available to 'any wacko'?
Can he get the name and address of the car's registered owner?
If Officer Friendly is undercover, will that blow his cover identity?
Will Fred finally kiss Daphne?
They do in private, and the courts have so ruled. Only when in public do they have no expectation of privacy.
Cite where they are required to give their name, and badge number?
Stop with the straw man, you cite where government actors when required to show ID are not required to comply,,
Do you still live in your cave, it is the 21st century..
Thank you for your reply.. As a LEO how would you feel if a private citizen wanted to take pictures or video of your personal automobile?
Thank you for servicing and protecting, I look forward to your honest reply.
Regards
CCJ
Do you live in a fantasy world? It seems so. YOU made the claim, YOU back it up with a citation.
Anytime anyone steps out into the public view their identity is open. Again that is why it is called public, not private.
The bigger issue, IMO, is that personal property that is kept private is required to be registered in some states. Such as firearms.
Then it should be easy for you to answer the question, yet I cannot help but notice you have dodged it multiple times. Hmmm, why is that?Are you that naive, this is the 21st century..
Now you are starting to come around.. The difference between a firearm and a vehicle is obvious, the vehicle tag is on display to everyone..
Because it is the holiday season, I shall throw you a small gift, however it will require you to do some due diligence, simply go to youtube and search cop block or enter filming federal buildings... The knowledge you seek is there.
If I were to give you a cite as requested, I would in theory be giving you legal advise.. My fee for legal advise is $350.00 an hour an you Sir don't deserve that big a Xmas gift, you were a naughty boy this year..
Please provide an actual and credible citation? Otherwise I will assume you made it up, and are not being honest.
So far you are spewing dogma.
He gave that hint long ago with his mind set of insincere valediction, "Regards" and "my 0.02."
So far you are spewing dogma.
Clearly you are intelligent enough to realize that different departments and agency's have different policy's, however you are naive if you don't think leo's and government actors are not obligated to ID themselves ( name and badge number) when interacting with a citizen.
naive officer WW-- approaching a law abiding citizen open carrying,
naive officer WW--- hi there, I see you are opening carrying, let me see some ID
(remaining lines omitted for brevity)
Dogma there, straw man argument here. Give it time and we'll have the whole pantheon of logical fallacies.
CCJ are these LEO's also obligated to identify themselves as police officers when they are acting undercover and busting drug suppliers or prostitutes, etc.?
What about uniformed officers on a SWAT team wearing balaclavas and serving a no-knock warrant, are they required to stop whatever they are doing and immediately inform whomever they are interacting with what their badge number is?
Informal logical fallacies contrast with formal fallacies.
CCJ - your postings would be easier to read IF they were grammatically correct.
The word is "shoot", not "shots". {Pulls his weapon and shots law abiding citizen} {why did you shot him?}