Terry v. Ohio was wrongly decided, one reason is that it is so easily subject to abuse, and Bloomberg's New York City is Exhibit A. Realistically, though, one US District Court judge doesn't have the moxy to resolve the problems inherent in Terry.
This Court was correct to point out that Bloomberg's obnoxious Stop and Frisk policies were lies designed to disguise the open secret that he was mis-targeting minorities because -- among other reasons, from his perspective & police excepted -- a black man cannot be trusted to safely carry a gun. Maybe more white people would have been stopped and frisked, and maybe this practice would have been more common in wealthy areas, but people in those areas would have flooded the mayor's office with angry calls if he did this, and the residents of these neighborhoods are Bloomberg's base. Stop and frisk can seem friendly and healthy if it is not directed at you, but crime is.
The 14th Amendment's Due Process clause makes the 4th Amendment's protections against arbitrary search and seizure applicable to state and local authorities like the NYPD, which is one reason why it is important. But the Equal Protection clause is equally important, because, among other reasons, it assures that minorities are not discriminated against in their Second Amendment rights.
OCDO claims that it is a civil rights organization and its membership often asserts that they are part of a civil rights movement. That means that its members should be protective of the civil and constitutional rights of minorities, including their rights under the Equal Protection clause. For the most part, I think it is. But for a very loud few, the open carry movement is just another way to display what regressive twits they are.
This decision is a real defeat for Bloomburg, who made stop and frisk the centerpiece of his anti-crime approach. Bloomburg's brand of antigun statism is the polar opposite of the philosophy this community represents, and if this decision is upheld on appeal, that is just as much cause for celebration as the courts' pro-gun decisions leading up to Heller.
PS. The Facebook page belongs to a lawyer who is interested in civil rights, and has participated in firearms related civil rights litigation. He now practices in Maryland, but anticipates expanding his practice into Virginia. Besides that, he is smart, handsome, humble, and follows interesting legal developments on Facebook. It is always a good idea to have a few firearms friendly lawyers in your state in your network. One more passive way to create a connection that may be useful in a bind is to find lawyers who you think could be helpful, save their links, and "like" their pages.