Aknazer
Regular Member
Have used and carried both SA and DB/SA autos and trained hundreds in the use of DB/SA autos I personally don't see what the problem of useing a DB/SA auto. Or the need for SA only. With proper training and paractice there really isn't any differance with getting frist round or 2nd round or more hits.
Its all about the training and learning to use what you carry. If one doesn't train properly or enough one is going to have trouble with any thing you carry.
It dosen't take long when teaching to find out who in the class cares about what they are doing and the ones who do not care. The ones who don't care are the ones who well have a hard time no matter what type of firearm they are given.
I guess you don't understand the state of the military currently. Sure with proper training the issue is solved, but the military rarely gives "proper training" unless you are one of the few who somehow manage to "qualify" for it, something most military members don't. Not that people shouldn't take their training into their own hands, but that isn't something that the military really helps most people with.
This training issue was also part of the reason for switching a bunch of guns from full auto to 3rd burst (or so I hear). A lot easier to simply mechanically limit the fire than to actually train the people how to handle full auto. And even now they only just added in 3rd burst training (and you get a whopping 9 rounds to practice with).
So really, the military needs to work on supplying proper training for people in the military.