Eeyore
Regular Member
That source is WRONG. Unless you want misinformation don't start there.
Nope, not wrong, just the most-conservative reading of conflicting case law. Your reading is the least-conservative interpretation. It sounds like you're on your way to being the first test case, and I'd be happy to contribute $$ to your defense fund if/when that happens. Once you've been arrested, charged, get it to trial, and win, then you can say that the website is wrong. Until then, it's Schoedinger's cat--indeterminate (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schroedinger's_cat for explanation of analogy).