imported post
Task Force 16 wrote:
Kwik for sure, you and the others that have formed his cheering section, possibly. some of you may very well becolaberating with kwik to deliberatly create the impression that OC'ers are all the durogatory descriptions the anti's ahve leveled at us. Some of you may just be guillable roobs that have fallen for the scherade
I can honestly say that this is the biggest, steamiest pile of horse crap I have ever seen uttered on this forum.
He is operating legally. He has broken no laws. You either support him on the fundamental level of exercising his rights, or simply GTFO.
If you disagree with his actions that is an entirely different subject, but SO LONG AS HE ACTS WITHIN THE LAW AND HIS RIGHTS, he doesn't deserve your giant "red flag" of ignorance.
Task Force 16 wrote:
Actually, You may be partially right. The anti's would love to see us at each others throats. The old "devide and conquer" strategy. But they also need to be able to show that some in our ranks approve of the antics that kwik has pulled. That's just the sort of stuff they want to present to the general public, to prop up their demented claims against gun owners/carriers.
Have approved of what? Legal, law-abiding activity?
Is that what you are screaming about?
Here let's draw this out crayola style:
He has not done ANYTHING illegal. NOTHING. PERIOD.
You do not support his wholly legal activities.
Therefore you do not support NORMAL exercising of ones rights.
Isn't that what you are complaining about? Yes. Yes it is in fact.
Sit here and scream at the top of your lungs at what Leonard is doing TF16. Make a huge spectacle out of it. Hell, with your help, and continued commentary, maybe it will be turned into a national circus! The more you complain about it, the more it is substantiated to others around you that it is in fact "odd", therefore lending credence to the idea that "carrying a firearm in the open is bad!". Slow down, take a deep breath, and figure out what you REALLY have a problem with here. Also realize that nobody is blowing this up as bad as you are.
In the end, it is apparent you simply do not support the following, as the facts present themselves.
1.) Wearing camo, perpetuating 'stereotypes' in a state park.
2.) An orange tip on a real firearm.
3.) Open Carrying a firearm in a state park, wherein it is legal.
4.) Open Carry of an AK47 Pistol
5.) Open Carry in the hand of a Navy Colt, as MANDATED by
law in Belle Meade.
Comically, the only thing there that should bat an eye, then be forgotten, is the orange tip thing. It is a whimsical non-point.
Did you ever stop to think, that maybe the thing they (antis) want us to do is disprove of his legal activities vehemently? Are you seriously stuck in the single track mind that having us "approve" of his actions (especially when they are completely LEGAL) is what they "want" us to do? How about DISPROVE and rage in bright red on the OCDO forum about his legal activities. How about that eh?
Ever think of that for even a second?
The rest of your post is disposable, and in doing so, nothing of value was lost.