Primus
Regular Member
You get any guns yet? Pics are always a plusWhile it is a violation of the second Amendment, I can see the reason behind it. Plus I wouldnt CC anyway. Either open or not at all
You get any guns yet? Pics are always a plusWhile it is a violation of the second Amendment, I can see the reason behind it. Plus I wouldnt CC anyway. Either open or not at all
I hope you're kidding.
Oh no...not kidding. I don't like to be bothered by gov't officials. If they got not reason to come over to me (ie arrest me~which they never do) then why would I want to talk to them at all?
The allegation is without merit. There seems to be four LEO who will corroborate that the accounts, as indicated in the "complaint", are not a factual representation of the events described.
Or, no recording, video or audio, no validity to the complaint. If the OP has irrefutable evidence that shows that the cops did exactly as he alleges then a law suit is in order...right up to the point he complied with their polite request, offered during a consensual encounter.
Anyway, let us know when those LEOs have been properly retrained.
Lol honestly your one of my favorite dudes on here. I'd buy you a beer if we were closer.The allegation is without merit. There seems to be four LEO who will corroborate that the accounts, as indicated in the "complaint", are not a factual representation of the events described.
Or, no recording, video or audio, no validity to the complaint. If the OP has irrefutable evidence that shows that the cops did exactly as he alleges then a law suit is in order...right up to the point he complied with their polite request, offered during a consensual encounter.
Anyway, let us know when those LEOs have been properly retrained.
Good luck and let us know what you can when the time is right.
Good luck and let us know what you can when the time is right.
Think you mean as a separate thread. It was merged with this one. Not sure what benefit you'd expect from essentually duplicate threads, which we discourage.Grapeshot, my update does not seem to be showing up as a separate post Can you fix?
If an attorney feels that litigation (on a contingency basis, I suggest) is appropriate I wish you the best.It seems that the Pueblo County Sheriff has not seen fit to respond to my complaint. http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?128781-My-complaint-to-the-Pueblo-Colorado-Sheriff
I am ready to lawyer up. I would like someone to give me the name of a good Second Amendment lawyer please...
The allegation is without merit. There seems to be four LEO who will corroborate that the accounts, as indicated in the "complaint", are not a factual representation of the events described.
Or, no recording, video or audio, no validity to the complaint. If the OP has irrefutable evidence that shows that the cops did exactly as he alleges then a law suit is in order...right up to the point he complied with their polite request, offered during a consensual encounter.
Anyway, let us know when those LEOs have been properly retrained.
If an attorney feels that litigation (on a contingency basis, I suggest) is appropriate I wish you the best.
However, if you are again confronted with a similar situation, you may find it advantageous to NOT write a note to the Chief, Sheriff, etc. but instead gather information rather than give it. You have already laid out your version of events, giving those who are inclined the opportunity to tailor their story around yours. Get my drift?
Think you mean as a separate thread. It was merged with this one. Not sure what benefit you'd expect from essentually duplicate threads, which we discourage.
I had a definite reason for writing the letter. There is dascam and bodycam video that can be subpoenaed.
It seems that the Pueblo County Sheriff has not seen fit to respond to my complaint. http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?128781-My-complaint-to-the-Pueblo-Colorado-Sheriff
I am ready to lawyer up. I would like someone to give me the name of a good Second Amendment lawyer please.
After this, I will no longer be free to comment on the pending litigation, but I welcome your input.
1. I was threatened with deadly force for exercising a right.
2. The deputy told me that I was not suspected of a crime, but would not let me go.
3. The deputy told me that I was not being detained, but would not let me go.
4. The deputy told me repeatedly that I had a right to carry a gun.
5. The deputy demanded my ID under an implied threat of force.
6. There is a strong probability that at least two dashcam videos exist.
I get that part, but throwing a string of cuss words at them just doesn't strike me as the professional way to go about things. But to each their own.
<sigh> Some people just don't get it.I had a definite reason for writing the letter. There is dascam and bodycam video that can be subpoenaed.
<sigh> Some people just don't get it.