Pretty scary that the state of Montana is doing all this verification of the publics' legality to possess firearms without most of their knowledge or permission. Federal judge asks for proof of this verification from the state of Montana and Montana says "well they just are by default"... Oh sure, the Federal government is just going to buy off on that one. Especially when a Federal prosecutor brings up the fact that Montana residents who are "verified" to qualify for a "license" to be exempt from the Federal GFSZA are still illegal to conceal the firearm unless they - wait for it - have a background check done by the state....so if the state already "verifies" all residents qualifications for a license to carry in a school zone - which has the same prohibitions as the concealed weapons permit, then why does the state require a second verification for the person to conceal the gun?
Don't get me wrong... Is the Federal restriction Constitutional? No, in my opinion. Does the Federal government ever enforce their own restriction? About once every 50 years. But can the state of Montana just exempt themselves from the restriction by default? No. Just like the Federal government does not exempt Montana made firearms sold by FFLs in Montana from the Federal requirements as stated in Montana code either.
Sure the license has not been verified in court, I highly doubt it ever will be. If you think the prosecution rate of the gun free zone act is low in other states, wait until you see the prosecution rate of it in Montana where the federal government would have to challenge the constitutionality of a state law.
The federal government is not going to want to challenge the law, get attorney generals involved, 2nd amendment groups, etc. In the end possibly losing and leaving the door wide open for other states to copy the law, essentially invalidating the federal gun free zone act. This all just to cite an individual with a misdemeanor (18 US Code 924 (a)(4)) for walking on the sidewalk in front of his house inside what is considered a 'school zone'.
As it stands, each person is licensed and verified by the state. If an individual such as the OP is not comfortable with this state licensure then extra legal safety can be obtained by getting a CWP. Personally, I would carry without a CWP in a school zone in Montana and not even worry about it. In fact I did while I waited for my 6 month residency time to pass.
Especially when a Federal prosecutor brings up the fact that Montana residents who are "verified" to qualify for a "license" to be exempt from the Federal GFSZA are still illegal to conceal the firearm unless they - wait for it - have a background check done by the state....so if the state already "verifies" all residents qualifications for a license to carry in a school zone - which has the same prohibitions as the concealed weapons permit, then why does the state require a second verification for the person to conceal the gun?
A CWP is optional in 90% of Montana which is constitutional carry. A lot of 'school zones' fall into the constitutional carry locations where the state does not require an individual to have a background check or a 'second verification' done. Instead it uses the state constitution and federal constitution as the permit. Additionally, the state does not run background checks on individuals open carrying. The individual licensure specified in Montana law uses the same authority to issue the license to individuals who are qualified under state law to obtain it.