ChristCrusader
Regular Member
VA allows any private property owner or authorized rep to prohibit firearms on their property. This seems to me to be a one-way (wrong-way) freedom of choice glitch on private property, where the owner can only prohibit rights, and not extend them.
It seems to me that VA should butt out and allow any private property owner the right to allow any form of carrying/possession they want to allow, by anyone they want to while being on their property, as if those welcomed were on their own properties.
As I can open or conceal on my property, regardless of CHP, I should be able to extend that right to whomever I want, for them to open or conceal on my property, to the extent as if they were on their own property. (This would exclude those prohibited by law to possess at all, since even if on their own property, they would still be prohibited).
Churches, private schools, restaurants, retailers, family get togethers on private property, all could extend their personal property rights to Constitutionally carry to their guests, sans CHP's.
Why has VA recognized only the property owner's individual rights, and not those whom he wishes to allow while on his property?
If someone's allowed to open/cc on their own property, why shouldn't they be able tp open/cc on someone else's private property with that owner's permission?
It seems to me that VA should butt out and allow any private property owner the right to allow any form of carrying/possession they want to allow, by anyone they want to while being on their property, as if those welcomed were on their own properties.
As I can open or conceal on my property, regardless of CHP, I should be able to extend that right to whomever I want, for them to open or conceal on my property, to the extent as if they were on their own property. (This would exclude those prohibited by law to possess at all, since even if on their own property, they would still be prohibited).
Churches, private schools, restaurants, retailers, family get togethers on private property, all could extend their personal property rights to Constitutionally carry to their guests, sans CHP's.
Why has VA recognized only the property owner's individual rights, and not those whom he wishes to allow while on his property?
If someone's allowed to open/cc on their own property, why shouldn't they be able tp open/cc on someone else's private property with that owner's permission?
Last edited: