ChristCrusader
Regular Member
Any permit, licensing, or training hurdles with attached costs, set up by the government between a person and their right to keep and bear arms, should be born by the government, not the individual seeking to exercise their right.
If society thinks it's in society's interest to have their govt erect these costly barriers, then society as a whole should bear those costs for that service they want provided to them - cuz it's certainly not a service that benefits the individual keeper/bearer, and erecting those hurdles before them are otherwise infringements.
You demand records or training? You pay for it. It certainly doesn't benefit me for the local courthouse to keep my record on file, or to have local, state, and federal authorities prying into my records. If society/courts say that I can have my gun(s), and are not restricting me from them, only that these other steps must be done for society's sake, then let society pay for what they want. Otherwise they are barriers to me.
If society thinks it's in society's interest to have their govt erect these costly barriers, then society as a whole should bear those costs for that service they want provided to them - cuz it's certainly not a service that benefits the individual keeper/bearer, and erecting those hurdles before them are otherwise infringements.
You demand records or training? You pay for it. It certainly doesn't benefit me for the local courthouse to keep my record on file, or to have local, state, and federal authorities prying into my records. If society/courts say that I can have my gun(s), and are not restricting me from them, only that these other steps must be done for society's sake, then let society pay for what they want. Otherwise they are barriers to me.
Last edited by a moderator: