I and my supporters are well known for defending the Second Amendment right to Open Carry and you are a well known supporter of CalGuns.nuts an organization which has a Federal lawsuit in California,
Richards v. Prieto, in which its attorney Alan Gura argued that California can ban Open Carry.
I remarked in the past how curious it is that this site provides a forum for so many opponents of the Second Amendment right to Open Carry.
Your beloved Peruta decision was just
cited by a district court to uphold California's roster listing which handguns can be legally sold in the State of California. The Peruta decision, if allowed to stand, can be cited to knock down every Second Amendment challenge in the 9th Circuit. And yet you and your fellow CalGuns/SAF/NRA/CRPA/GOA/GOC/ members applaud the decision?
FYI, There is not now, and never has been a right to concealed carry. Not under the Second Amendment and not under common law:
“If, after an interchange of blows on equal terms, one of the parties, on a sudden, and without any such intention at the commencement of the affray, snatches up a deadly weapon and kills the other party with it, such killing will be only manslaughter. But if a party, under colour of fighting upon equal terms, uses from the beginning of the contest a deadly weapon without the knowledge of the other party, and kills the other party with such weapon; or if, at the beginning of the contest he prepares a deadly weapon, so as to have the power of using it in some part of the contest, and uses it accordingly in the course of the combat, and kills the other party with the weapon; the killing in both these cases will be murder.” Whiteley’s case, 1 Lewin 173 (1829) – Wharton, Francis (1855) A Treatise on the Law of Homicide in the United States, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Kay & Brother