eye95
Well-known member
They are already doing it, so let's get involved in how they do it.
No.
No.
Yea how did that compromise and trusting the gun grabber thing work in California.Regardless of whether they have the constitutional authority or not, they have already obtained the authority to do it. Getting that authority taken away is going to be a long journey, and forcing a larger majority vote could be one small step in that journey. Doesn't really matter if you buy into it or not...they have the authority right now to pass any gun control legislation with a majority vote. Yes, we need to work to change that back to how it should be, but it's not going to happen overnight, nor all at once.
Even a 2/3 majority cannot morally abridge a right. We are a Republic, not a democracy.
+10 Rights are not available for discussion.
The tyranny of the super-majority!
The only thing congress should pass is a bill stating that they have no authority to infringe on the RKBA and that all laws restricting the ownership or carry of handguns, rifles, shotguns, or variants thereof is hereby repealed.
No one. Because even those who purport to be "pro-2A" don't think this way.
Supporting the law legitimizes the theory that Congress has the authority to infringe upon my gun rights. They don't.
Supporting the law would translate to "I guess you can infringe on my right to keep and bear arms....but only if you really mean it."
No. The Right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. And I'm not going to legitimize the issue by setting a higher bar for them to jump over.