color of law
Accomplished Advocate
So the "or" argument remains untested.
Well, in a round and about way they have.
State v. Harrison, 2013-Ohio-1235 (March, 2013)
{¶14} The “intrusion” that occurred in the case before us was reasonably warranted. Officer Hawley observed Harrison commit two violations of law, and properly obtained and checked Harrison’s identification. “t is well established that an officer may ask a suspect to identify himself in the course of a Terry stop.” Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nevada,Humboldt Cty., 542 U.S. 177, 187, 124 S.Ct. 2451, 159 L.Ed.2d 292 (2004). In Hiibel, the United States Supreme Court also stressed that:
Obtaining a suspect's name in the course of a Terry stop serves important government interests. Knowledge of identity may inform an officer that a suspect is wanted for another offense, or has a record of violence or mental disorder. On the other hand, knowing identity may help clear a suspect and allow the police to concentrate their efforts elsewhere. Id. at 186-187.