KS_to_CA
Regular Member
imported post
marshaul wrote:
It is my understanding that this means rifles and shotguns, same as in the CA AGO's website.
marshaul wrote:
Well what do you make of this "other firearm capable of being concealed on the person,"?CA_Libertarian wrote:
Read (c)(2) again and tell me what it says.I don't see anything indicating the wording from 626.9 does not apply to long guns. It says "a firearm." Logically, that means any/all firearms. The exemption in (c)(2) does specifically name concealable firearms.
Remember the distinction between "section", "subdivision", and "paragraph".
Note that (c)(2) does not exempt "possession" of long guns in school zones, thus not contradicting (b). It merely allows for transportation if otherwise in accordance with state law. Thus one may be prosecuted under 626.9 for possession of a long gun in a school zone if one is either A: not traveling anywhere or B: in violation of any other code. The law doesn't seem to contradict itself if interpreted this way, and this analysis is the only way I can reconcile (c)(2) with (b).
It is my understanding that this means rifles and shotguns, same as in the CA AGO's website.