My reply was in reply to the post made by solus. I'm not sure if that is blocked from you so I'll just paste it here:
solus: "Clifford's law center 1 Nov 17 updated article:
quote: The Kentucky Attorney General has interpreted section 237.115(2) to mean that “a local government, without otherwise violating the statutory prohibition contained in [section 65.870], may prohibit or limit the carrying of concealed deadly weapons in buildings or portions of buildings owned, leased, or controlled by a county.” 10 (#10: 96 Ky. Op. Att’y Gen. 39, 1996 Ky. AG LEXIS 79)
However, a county judge/executive (the chief elected official of counties in Kentucky) does not qualify as a “legislative body” and thus cannot regulate the carrying of concealed deadly weapons in the designated areas. That authority instead falls to the fiscal court of a county because the fiscal court is the county’s legislative body. 11 (#11 KRS § 237.115(2) & (3)) unquote.
http://lawcenter.giffords.org/local-...s-in-kentucky/
seems Gutshot, there might be a slight conflict or confusion factor between your perceptions of KRS 65.870 and the KY AG on the ability of KY county fiscal court(s) to, in fact, prohibit/limit concealed weapons IAW 237.115(2)!"
I meant to say AG opinion supported existing LAW but instead made it sound like it created law and that is my bad. I hope this give context to my post. I've said it before and I'll say it again...THANK YOU for what you do. I don't get on the forum as much as I used to but I try to keep an eye out for areas I can help in.