The article admits she didn't break the law, but look at the unions justification:
"if you capture something on video that can be evidentiary, you run the risk that your phone/video can be confiscated to further the case".
That last part is really gives insight to the mindset. You record law enforcement breaking the law, and their excuse to confiscate your device is to further the case....... yeah, right. I see them logging that video and giving it to internal affairs or a review board.
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/...olice-Misconduct-in-New-Haven--157522235.html
Jonathan
"if you capture something on video that can be evidentiary, you run the risk that your phone/video can be confiscated to further the case".
That last part is really gives insight to the mindset. You record law enforcement breaking the law, and their excuse to confiscate your device is to further the case....... yeah, right. I see them logging that video and giving it to internal affairs or a review board.
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/...olice-Misconduct-in-New-Haven--157522235.html
Jonathan