Is gun ownership now considered by the awe inspiring and trendsetting navelgazers and hatemongers at the dear old Uni to be a product of whiteness and patriarchy?
Perhaps searching for a real encounter with some fictional made-for-TV fake racist, sexist, whitey, manny recollections with a bad Suthin accent such as "Yep my pappy and granpappy always warned me bout the wetbacks and the nee-groes, to always have plenty of lead ready to keep them and the wimminfolks in line" etc?
Or could it be more like "My mama always warned me about the white folks - don't never trust them. So any mo cracker mofo's step into our hood, we gonna pop in a cap in they pretty white butts. I'mma get you sucka!"
So much for stories in search of stereotypes. Hey I know, how about tracking down a Bigfoot (equally likely to find in the real world) and ask why they DON'T use guns? (Seems like they would have the ability. Must be some reason on principle, right?)
All joking aside, because this is anything but funny, it seems seriously racist and not-overly-bright at first glance to limit a study to white males (likely the target of a brown-nose-the-professor inspired vendetta) when women and people of many races, creeds, and social groups have contributed to guns and gun culture.
Did Annie Oakley no longer exist, in the eyes of the University? Just because it's an inconvenient truth in an age when fake "Moms against Whatever" are preferred by liberal leaning professors?
Are Nat Love and other black gunslingers of history also wiped clean from the new revised record cuz they don't fit the narrative?
Why not interview that NRA good old boy, Colion Noir, and his homies? Wrong color? Wrong side of town? Even though people can "identify" as a race or gender or heritage that doesn't match their genetic details, blacks can't identify as gunowners? Colored folks can't be trusted to think for themselves, have to steer them in the right direction?
Fact is, guns are tools made for and owned by all sorts of people. As long as they're fully LEGAL Americans who pledge allegiance to our flag and respect our sacred Constitution and our equality under God and the law, I couldn't really care less who the hell they are. (Though I do give more credence to true genetic details than wild-eyed identify-as classifications or classroom mantras.)
Degrees are fine as far as paper goes - mighty nice piece of paper - but so many people spend years and piles of money without realizing that the very first step of learning is honesty and consistency. Without those, you can never attain good arguments, much less true intellectual achievements.
It's never too late to embrace them and start experiencing REAL life and learning! Then a higher academic degree will represent the corresponding level of wisdom and experience, not just a piece of paper earned by the dubious practice of kissing up and parroting any insane garbage spouted by America-hating buffoons hiding in the darker shadows of academia and giving their fellow scholars a bad name. I hope honesty and consistency is the path you'll take.
There might be assumptions here as to your intentions, but with extremely good reasons considering the trends - 9 of 10 studies or interviews of this type are dishonestly biased. We want the best for you, us, and our nation!
Perhaps searching for a real encounter with some fictional made-for-TV fake racist, sexist, whitey, manny recollections with a bad Suthin accent such as "Yep my pappy and granpappy always warned me bout the wetbacks and the nee-groes, to always have plenty of lead ready to keep them and the wimminfolks in line" etc?
Or could it be more like "My mama always warned me about the white folks - don't never trust them. So any mo cracker mofo's step into our hood, we gonna pop in a cap in they pretty white butts. I'mma get you sucka!"
So much for stories in search of stereotypes. Hey I know, how about tracking down a Bigfoot (equally likely to find in the real world) and ask why they DON'T use guns? (Seems like they would have the ability. Must be some reason on principle, right?)
All joking aside, because this is anything but funny, it seems seriously racist and not-overly-bright at first glance to limit a study to white males (likely the target of a brown-nose-the-professor inspired vendetta) when women and people of many races, creeds, and social groups have contributed to guns and gun culture.
Did Annie Oakley no longer exist, in the eyes of the University? Just because it's an inconvenient truth in an age when fake "Moms against Whatever" are preferred by liberal leaning professors?
Are Nat Love and other black gunslingers of history also wiped clean from the new revised record cuz they don't fit the narrative?
Why not interview that NRA good old boy, Colion Noir, and his homies? Wrong color? Wrong side of town? Even though people can "identify" as a race or gender or heritage that doesn't match their genetic details, blacks can't identify as gunowners? Colored folks can't be trusted to think for themselves, have to steer them in the right direction?
Fact is, guns are tools made for and owned by all sorts of people. As long as they're fully LEGAL Americans who pledge allegiance to our flag and respect our sacred Constitution and our equality under God and the law, I couldn't really care less who the hell they are. (Though I do give more credence to true genetic details than wild-eyed identify-as classifications or classroom mantras.)
Degrees are fine as far as paper goes - mighty nice piece of paper - but so many people spend years and piles of money without realizing that the very first step of learning is honesty and consistency. Without those, you can never attain good arguments, much less true intellectual achievements.
It's never too late to embrace them and start experiencing REAL life and learning! Then a higher academic degree will represent the corresponding level of wisdom and experience, not just a piece of paper earned by the dubious practice of kissing up and parroting any insane garbage spouted by America-hating buffoons hiding in the darker shadows of academia and giving their fellow scholars a bad name. I hope honesty and consistency is the path you'll take.
There might be assumptions here as to your intentions, but with extremely good reasons considering the trends - 9 of 10 studies or interviews of this type are dishonestly biased. We want the best for you, us, and our nation!