I'll repeat this one more time. A firearm is different from your immutable traits, CRA 1964, and a firearm is different from your religion of choice. A private property owner can kick you out just cuz you is armed. If you got a beef with that then take the anti-2A owner to court via a civil proceeding. You let us all know how that works out for ya...and how much it cost as well.One cannot be denied entry to a business because of their religion, freedom of religion don't ya know.
Religion is a choice guranteed by the BOR. Also a pre-existing right .
Like the RTKABA.
Carrying a gun is a CHOICE also guranteed by the BOR and prexisted this nation.
Same thing . Open to the public business has no right, at all, to 1 claim its public and private at the same time.
Or deny the RTKABA anymore than it does to ban a person because of religious dress of symbols worn.
The constitution is a restraint on the state, not a restraint on me. I can kick you off my property if you OC a Glock and let the fella next to you OCing a 1911 stay. You don't like that? Take me to court.
Unless you is gunna take the anti-2A owner to court to school him on preexisting rights all of our bluster is nothing but hot air.