color of law
Accomplished Advocate
Really????? you know they don't have police powers, that's the point.EMTs are still a government agency
Really????? you know they don't have police powers, that's the point.EMTs are still a government agency
they are?EMTs are still a government agency
EMTs are still a government agency
they are?
omg really??? yes bro, really. and yes i know.Really????? you know they don't have police powers, that's the point.
yea dude. the ambulance or firetruck that has the county or city name on the side of the truck is owned and employed and serviced by the local government.they are?
Hammer, did the thought these kind folk could be contract entities and just supplying professional Services...yea dude. the ambulance or firetruck that has the county or city name on the side of the truck is owned and employed and serviced by the local government.
I've come to the conclusion that you are a troll; offering nothing to any discussion.omg really??? yes bro, really. and yes i know.
The SC just declared that "this ain't one".What is a wellness check? As I explained the SC has never addressed wellness checks. Now there is the “emergency aid doctrine" which the courts say does not require a warrant., but the SC has failed to define what that exactly is.
And that's why Judge Alito sent a warning shot across the bow about "Red Flag" laws and the fourth amendment.The SC just declared that "this ain't one".
The term "surrender" is a voluntary act. Courts cannot order someone to volunteer to do anything, but they do it all the time. Rubio's Bill then says if the firearms are not surrendered then a warrant can be issued for the seizure of those firearms. And this is why Judge Alito said hold on boys, you are on shaky ground.(C) If a court issues an extreme risk protection order, the order shall contain—
(vi) a description of the requirements for surrender of all firearms and ammunition owned by the respondent; and
(vii) a clear statement of instruction on surrendering to the appropriate local law enforcement agency.....
i could say the same thing about numerous of your own posts on this forumI've come to the conclusion that you are a troll; offering nothing to any discussion.
Link us to one of your postings that actually offers a substantive contribution addressing a legal topic presented on this forum. I won't hold my breath.i could say the same thing about numerous of your own posts on this forum